2012年6月28日星期四

Justices Samuel Alito

Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia ray ban and oakley and Clarence Thomas dissented in the Alvarez case. "These lies have no value in and of themselves, and proscribing them does not chill any valuable speech," Alito said. "By holding that the First Amendment nevertheless shields these lies, the court breaks sharply from a long line of cases recognizing that the right to free speech does not protect false statements that inflict real harm and serve no legitimate interest." Alvarez made his claims in introducing himself as an elected member of the Three Valleys Municipal Water District in Pomona, Calif. There is nothing to suggest that he received anything in exchange or that listeners especially believed him. The government had defended the law oakley sunglasses 2012 review as necessary to punish impostors to protect the integrity of military medals. B.G. "Jug" Burkett, the Vietnam veteran whose 1998 book, "Stolen Valor," inspired the law, said he was disappointed with the ruling. "It kind of blows my mind," Burkett said. "The Medal of Honor! The vast majority of the people who were awarded that were killed in action in the service of their country, and we can't protect that decoration rayban and oklay sunglasses from disrespect?"

没有评论:

发表评论